Videos show Prince Andrew partying in nightclubs with beautiful young women on the French Riviera

The Duke of York’s claims he ‘never really partied’ and avoided ‘public displays of affection’ have been seriously undermined as new footage of him letting loose with a bevy of young women in Saint-Tropez is exclusively revealed by MailOnline today.

Prince Andrew is shown at a wild party thrown by wine tycoon Claude Ott on the French Riviera in July 2008, just weeks after his disgraced friend Jeffrey Epstein was prosecuted for trafficking an underage girl and forcing her into prostitution.   

The Prince insisted in his car crash BBC interview with Emily Maitlis on Saturday night that he wasn’t a ‘party prince’, did not sweat because he was shot at in the Falklands and was ‘not one to hug’ women as he dismissed damaging claims he slept with his friend Epstein’s sex slave Virginia Roberts.  

But in the new film the Prince appears worse for wear, his hair dishevelled with a hint of sweat and jacket abandoned. Dressed in all white, with his shirt untucked, he is seen heading to the dance floor with two women as techno blares out before he settles down talking to several glamorous female guests, getting in close to chat because of the loud music. 

A year earlier, in July 2007, photographs from another bash further trash his claims of avoiding partying and PDA because he is seen sweating and embracing a number of women including socialite Chris Von Aspen, who he holds by the waist before she later licks his face in Saint-Tropez.

At a different party on the same trip Andrew, who earned the nickname ‘Randy Andy’, is seen gripping Canadian socialite Pascale Bourbeau with one hand close to her bottom.

And at the start of the decade, the royal is seen chatting to German supermodel Heidi Klum at a Hookers and Pimps-themed Halloween party held in New York in October 2000, which was also attended by Epstein’s alleged co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, who had her arm round him for part of the night.  

At the 2008 party where he was filmed he was seen dancing at close quarters with a woman named at the time as Libyan model Nadia Boejna. He then left with a group of women, witnesses claimed.

Prince Andrew is facing an extraordinary backlash over his interview, which Prince Charles’ former PR chief Dickie Arbiter described as: ‘Not so much a car crash but an articulated lorry crash’.  Mr Arbiter said he must ‘take a break’ from royal duties, adding: ‘What charity wants a VIP guest with this hanging over him?’

His older brother Charles has reportedly been urged to consider downgrading the Duke of York’s status as a working royal when he takes to the throne because of the damage he has caused to the royal family’s reputation.

Viewers described watching Andrew’s grilling by Ms Maitlis from behind their sofas and through their fingers as he denied having sex with Virginia Roberts because he was in Pizza Express in Woking.

He suggested that the world-famous picture of his arm around Ms Roberts’ waist at Ghislaine Maxwell’s London mews house could be faked as he denied ever meeting her.

Miss Roberts’ evidence that he sweated ‘profusely’ on the three occasions she claims they gad sex were explained away by the duke claiming a rush of adrenaline while being shot at during the Falklands conflict in 1982 made it impossible for him to perspire.

A royal source claimed last night he has defiantly told his mother the Queen that his appearance on the BBC Two Newsnight special was largely a ‘great success’ – but a friend told the Mail he ‘regretted’ not expressing sympathy for Jeffrey Epstein’s victims in his disastrous TV interview.

Today former royal protection officer said it went so badly for Prince Andrew it should spark a police investigation.

Dai Davies said he and the millions who watched would be ‘utterly unconvinced’ by the duke’s denial that he slept with a teenager, or even met her. He said that he displayed ‘classic signs’ of someone not telling the truth amd told the Mirror: ‘It beggars belief the stupidity of his answers.’ 

As the fallout from Andrew’s extraordinary TV interview continues, it has emerged: 

• 2.5million people watched BBC interview already branded the most damaging ever carried out by a royal;
• Prince Andrew reportedly popped into church and told the Queen that his bombshell BBC interview was a ‘great success’;
• Friends suggest he wishes he had expressed more sympathy for Epstein’s victims in TV interview – but he is said to insist that it BBC sit-down was ‘right thing to do’;
• Prince Charles has arrived in New Zealand with his tour undermined; He has been urged to consider downgrading the Duke of York’s status as a working royal when he takes to the throne;
• Emily Maitlis says that the Duke asked the Queen’s permission to take part in the interview;
• Experts claim Andrew must avoid public duties until at least next year – and charities may not want to be associated with him;
• Laywers representing Epstein’s victims say Duke of York must now help police with investigation; 

US lawyer Spencer Kulvin, who represents a woman who claims she was a victim of Epstein, told Radio 4’s Today programme Andrew should come forward to help the on-going investigation into the disgraced American financier.

Mr Kulvin said: ‘As a lawyer I was rather shocked that he would go on camera like this because anything he says can be utilised in a cross examination of him later, should he choose to come forward, and actually, in an official capacity, allow himself to be interviewed by the US authorities – which I believe he should do.

‘I don’t think there’s any way that a man who’s been to all three of Mr Epstein’s homes could avoid seeing what was going on in those homes, with people going in and out and young girls being shuttled in and out of those homes.’ 

Speaking on Good Morning Britain, Gloria Allred, a lawyer representing other alleged victims in the Epstein case, said about Andrew: ‘I don’t see how he could have not known that there were underage girls – minors. Because he did visit homes of Mr Epstein in New York, in Palm Beach, in the Virgin Islands; and I happen to know there were underage girls in all of those locations.

‘So, why didn’t he ask the questions: Where are your parents, are you in school, why aren’t you in school, are you living here, are you working here, what kind of job do you have, what do you do, why are you here?’ she said.

She went on to say she did not know how the duke could not have seen the young girls because ‘there were so many of them’.

Asked what questions she would like to ask Andrew, Ms Allred said she wanted to know ‘Who helped to recruit underage girls for Mr Epstein to be sexually assaulted, who was in the chain, who assisted, who knowingly conspired with Mr Epstein to traffic – to sex traffic – these children to Mr Epstein.’  

Pictures of Andrew partying in the ‘noughties’ appear to undermine claims made in the BBC interview. 

The previous summer Andrew was pictured cozying up to Canadian model Pascale Bourbeau at a bash he attended alongside his eldest daughter Princess Beatrice.

He appears to put his hand on Pascale’s rear as they stand close together at the home of billionaire fire extinguisher magnate Tony Murray. 

That night he was also filmed chatting with Polish-born socialite Beata Bohman – who went on to make headlines when she was arrested for shoplifting an $11,000 fur-lined scarf in New York. 

At one point, Andrew was pictured tensely looking at his mobile phone alongside a bald man who was described by onlookers as his ‘fixer’. 

Later, he headed to a marina at Murray’s mansion and got on a boat accompanied by ‘five or six women’ while Beatrice, now 31, left separately, according to a witness. 

A former Saint-Tropez reveler revealed: ‘These were really crazy years for Andrew.

‘He was clearly having a full-blown midlife crisis. He would have been 47 or 48 at the time, divorced from Sarah Ferguson, and basking in the attention he got from young women. 

‘These were private parties held at mansions so I guess he felt he could let his guard down. 

‘Things can get quite loose in Saint-Tropez. There were lots of beautiful young women looking for rich men. 

‘People would often go off to the toilets to do drugs or for oral sex. 

‘That was the best time to party in Saint-Tropez. Social media hadn’t really taken off and most people didn’t have cameras on their phone yet so people could just go and have fun. 

‘Lots of the girls gravitated towards Andrew – royalty has that effect on the kind of women who flock to Saint-Tropez.’ 

Andrew’s partying days have come under increased scrutiny recently due to his controversial relationship with Epstein, who killed himself aged 66 in a New York jail cell in August after being arrested on federal sex trafficking charges.

Following Epstein’s death, the Prince released a statement denying he ever saw or suspected any criminal behavior by the wealthy financier. 

However, he has faced a barrage of claims, including from Ms Roberts who accuse the Duke of York of sleeping with her while she was underage. 

The row was thrown further into the spotlight last night after Andrew’s ‘car crash’ BBC interview. 

The ‘no holds barred’ interview saw the Prince quizzed on his relationship with Epstein – and he again denied ever having sex with the financier’s ‘sex slave’ Ms Roberts.

The Duke faced a flurry of questions about his links to the paedophile, who was found dead aged 66 earlier this year in a New York prison cell while being held on sex trafficking charges.

Andrew maintained he does not recall meeting Ms Roberts and said he did not spend time with her at Tramp Nightclub in London on March 10, 2001, after which she claims the pair first had sex.

He denied he slept with her on three separate occasions, saying the encounter in 2001 did not happen because he had taken his daughter Princess Beatrice to Pizza Express in Woking for a party, and they spent the rest of the day together.

As part of his defence, he disputed claims that he was sweating on the night he partied with Ms Roberts.

Andrew said: ‘There’s a slight problem with the sweating because I have a peculiar medical condition which is that I don’t sweat or I didn’t sweat at the time.

‘I didn’t sweat at the time because I had suffered what I would describe as an overdose of adrenalin in the Falkland’s War when I was shot at and it was almost impossible for me to sweat.

‘And it’s only because I have done a number of things in the recent past that I am starting to be able to do that again. So I’m afraid to say that there’s a medical condition that says that I didn’t do it.’

He added: ‘I’ve no recollection of ever meeting her, I’m almost, in fact I’m convinced that I was never in Tramps with her.

‘There are a number of things that are wrong with that story, one of which is that I don’t know where the bar is in Tramps.

‘I don’t drink, I don’t think I’ve ever bought a drink in Tramps whenever I was there.’

The latest video and pictures have put Andrew under yet more scrutiny.  

Pictures from top model Heidi Klum’s 2000 Halloween party show him hanging out with Epstein’s alleged co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. 

The pair can be seen together at the ‘Hookers and Pimps’-themed party in New York City. 

Maxwell – the daughter of disgraced British press baron Robert Maxwell – wears a bleach blonde wig, midriff bearing top and gold pants as she chats to Andrew. 

The now infamous picture showing the Prince and Maxwell with alleged ‘teen sex slave’ Virginia Roberts is thought to have been taken the following year by Epstein in London. 

Virginia, 35, alleges Epstein and Maxwell, 57, directed her to have sex three times with Andrew – claims that both he and Maxwell vehemently deny. 

Donald Trump and his then-girlfriend Melania Knauss were also pictured posing with Klum at the party.  In the photos from the Halloween party, Andrew can be seen chatting to Klum, now 46.

In another infamous set of pictures taken on the French Riviera in July 2007 the Prince looks wild-eyed as he parties with American socialite Chris Von Aspen.

The blonde interior designer can be seen licking the Prince as the pair cavorted together.

An onlooker said: ‘Chris was buzzed from drinking and had met Andrew before so she approached him. 

‘She was a real party girl back then and went to all the celebrity parties in New York, LA, Saint-Tropez and Monaco. 

‘Chris later claimed she hooked up with Andrew and you can see in the pictures that he was having a great time with her.

‘He had a wild look in his eye – you can see that in the pictures too. 

‘Chris was going out with Prince Albert of Monaco’s right-hand man Bruno Philipponnat and got into trouble with him when the pictures came out.’

The photograph that WON’T go away: Anatomy of the infamous image of Prince Andrew with Jeffrey Epstein’s teenage ‘sex slave’ Virginia Roberts… that Duke of York insists he ‘can’t recall being taken’

The photograph of Prince Andrew with his hands around Virginia Roberts’ waist has long been seen as key to establishing the truth in this sordid saga.

Both sides view it as a key piece of evidence. To Miss Roberts, the March 2001 image proved beyond doubt that her claims of intimacy are true; others have suggested an equally dark secret which could prove the prince is telling the truth.

On the night it was taken, Miss Roberts , then 17, said she went on to have sex with Andrew after being brought to Britain by his billionaire friend and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

She maintains it was snapped in society hostess Ghislaine Maxwell’s central London mews house after a night out in Mayfair. However, the prince, who has always denied having sex with her, insisted that he had ‘no recollection’ of meeting her or posing for the photo.

He also echoed previously unnamed royal sources who have queried the photo’s veracity, even hinting that the hand around her waist may not be his. He suggested he would never have hugged anyone in public and raised questions about his own attire.

The Duke told interviewer Emily Maitlis: ‘I have absolutely no memory of that photograph ever being taken. From the investigations that we’ve done, you can’t prove whether or not that photograph is faked or not because it is a photograph of a photograph of a photograph.

‘So it’s very difficult to be able to prove it but I don’t remember that photograph ever being taken.’ He also stated: ‘I’ve never seen Epstein with a camera in my life.’

Miss Maitlis suggested his former friend had borrowed Miss Roberts’ camera, leaving the prince to respond: ‘Listen, I don’t remember. I don’t remember that photograph ever being taken.’

The photo supposedly shows the first floor of the property, with the window appearing to match one at the front of the house. But the prince denied he had been on the first floor.

Miss Maitlis asked: ‘There’s a photo inside Ghislaine Maxwell’s house, Ghislaine herself in the background. Why would people not believe that you were there with her that night?’ He replied: ‘They might well wish to believe it but the photograph is taken upstairs and I don’t think I ever went upstairs… because the dining room and everything was on the ground floor… I’m at a loss to explain this particular photograph.

‘I don’t remember going upstairs because that photograph was taken upstairs and I am not entirely convinced that… we can’t be certain as to whether or not that’s my hand on her whatever it is, side.’ 

The prince even questioned his own casual clothing in the photo. He said: ‘I don’t believe it’s a picture of me in London because when I would go out in London, I wear a suit and a tie.’ 

Instead he is dressed in dark trousers and a light blue shirt, with cufflinks adorning his sleeves. Other photos show this was his favoured look at the time and he was pictured in almost exactly the same clothing as he left London’s Chinawhite club a few months earlier.

In the Newsnight interview, he also argued he would not have placed his arm around the teenager, saying: ‘I am not one to, as it were, hug and public displays of affection are not something I do.’ But that claim also seems to be contradicted by a number of photos over the years.

When Miss Maitlis asked: ‘You think that photo has been faked? Andrew responded: ‘Nobody can prove whether or not that photograph has been doctored but I don’t recollect that photograph being taken. So that’s the best explanation I can give you and I’m afraid to say that I don’t believe that photograph was taken in the way that has been suggested.’

‘If the original was ever produced, then perhaps we might be able to solve it but I can’t.’ The picture was first published by The Mail on Sunday in 2011 after the newspaper found Miss Roberts living in a small bungalow in New South Wales. She is said to have given the original, along with 19 other images, to FBI investigators in 2011.

In recent months, Andrew’s friends have tried to discredit the photograph. A source told the London Evening Standard: ‘Look at his fingers in the photo. The duke has quite chubby fingers – they don’t look right and nor does the height of the duke and the girl.’

However, while Andrew is said to be around 6ft tall, Virginia is understood to be around 5ft 8in – which is reflected in the picture. Other pictures of his hands do not highlight any obvious discrepancies. Experts have pointed out the practice of manipulating images was in its infancy when the picture was taken.

Miss Roberts’ lawyers have insisted the photograph is real and its authenticity never questioned by the FBI.

RICHARD KAY: Prince Andrew showed NO sympathy for Jeffrey Epstein’s victims. In his jaw-droppingly insensitive interview, he showed the kind of royal he actually is: self-important, patronising and out of touch

No one watching Prince Andrew’s car-crash TV interview could have failed to recoil at the tone of contempt in his voice when the question of why he had stayed in Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion after the sex offender’s release from prison was raised.

It was, he said, a ‘convenient’ place to stay. (He might have added, but didn’t, that the hospitality was free.)

If an icy sense of entitlement could take the form of a man’s voice, this was it.

By then, Emily Maitlis’s gripping Newsnight encounter had already cut deep, gaping wounds into the credibility of the Queen’s second son. But they were, by and large, all self-inflicted.

Not a word of sympathy for the victims of Epstein’s appalling crimes during the interview, not a syllable of understanding about them passed from his lips, and only the briefest of regrets for his friendship with the billionaire paedophile in the first place.

The jaw-dropping insensitivity of it all left millions of viewers, not just in Britain but around the world, asking: why?

Why on earth had he agreed to do this, and what was he thinking?

Today, after one of the most egregious acts of self-harm by any member of the Royal Family at any time, the question must be: where does the Duke of York go from here?

Andrew hoped that his candour would be transforming, that with 45 minutes of tough questioning from one of the BBC’s star performers, he would demonstrate both his honesty and his relatability.

He also believed it would draw a line under the torrent of negative headlines about his conduct and behaviour.

How naive that seems now.

What emerged from the programme was a prince from another age. From his demonstrable lack of self-awareness, to answers that at times insulted the viewers’ intelligence, Andrew showed the kind of royal he actually is — self-important, patronising and out of touch.

The fact is he has always been like that. When a friend once suggested that to improve his public image amid criticism over his ‘Airmiles Andy’ reputation, he might consider using trains or the Underground, the Duke spluttered: ‘But I am the son of the monarch…’

Unsaid, what he meant was: as a senior member of the Royal Family, he could not possibly take public transport.

But then, this goes to the heart of Andrew’s character. All those years as heir in line to the throne — before Prince Charles had his family — have given Andrew an inflated sense of his own importance.

So what was it that propelled Andrew into Newsnight’s embrace, allowing himself to be exposed to a potentially image-shredding humiliation? After all, there was every good reason not to do it.

Epstein had taken his own life in prison in New York in August, while some would argue the currency of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who claimed that as a teenager she had sex with the Prince three times, has diminished somewhat with every telling of her story.

In the end, it was not the questions put to him by the forensic Ms Maitlis for which the programme will be remembered, but rather the answers and the failure of the Prince to offer even as much as a degree of humility. At times, in fact, the Newsnight presenter let him off the hook.

After pressing him on whether he had sex with Virginia Roberts (as she was then), which he denied, she could have asked if he had slept with any other women under Epstein’s roof. She did not.

Nor did she pick him up on his bizarre explanation about why, when he had travelled to New York to end his friendship with Epstein, he thought it OK to go for a walk with him in Central Park, one of the most public places in the world.

Maitlis might also have explored more forcefully Andrew’s decision to break with Epstein in person. Royals drop friends and acquaintances all the time. Charles does it and Diana used to do it by changing her phone number. All Andrew needed to do was stop taking Epstein’s calls and the message would soon have got through.

Instead, he chose to do it in person, and the temptation undoubtedly was to enjoy one last stay in the tycoon’s opulent home.

She could have pressed him on massages: had he had any, and where? We know that Epstein’s massage rooms were illustrated with crude pictures of naked women and discarded sex toys. Had he noticed anything?

To her credit, Ms Maitlis was suitably taken aback by the crass and convoluted explanation he offered about seeing Epstein in person to end their friendship in 2010 — two years after Epstein’s jailing for prostituting minors — as being one of honour.

And she gaspingly challenged his use of the word ‘unbecoming’ to describe the actions of the child sex offender. It was one of the rare occasions when she drew an apology from the Duke.

(Although he even managed to mangle that by earlier suggesting it was ‘unbecoming’ for a member of the Royal Family to consort with a paedophile, failing to see that it would be wrong for anyone to fraternise with a child sex offender.)

But mainly his manner was far from regretful. At the end, Maitlis gave him every opportunity to say something, anything, which would have allowed him to display a rare glimpse of humanity.

Surely, as the father of daughters himself, he would have seized that opportunity to say something about Epstein’s sickening offences towards women. He chose not to. Maitlis even asked him if he had anything to feel apologetic about in his friendship with Epstein. He did not, or perhaps he could not.

Indeed, he did the opposite, speaking of the ‘opportunities’ that came his way because of the businessman which ‘were actually very useful’.

This was raw, breath-taking, yet toe-curling stuff, and it is hard to see how Andrew can possibly recover. His hope — and it can only be that — is that by casting doubt on some of the evidence which has been laid against him in relation to the sex allegations, he may have discovered a chink of light.

However, even then, he was hardly convincing.

While his memory that he had never been to the bar at Tramp, the West End nightclub, does ring true — Andrew rarely buys his own drinks, a police bodyguard normally does that — his bizarre claim that he could not sweat puzzled many viewers. 

In her affidavit, Roberts says he was sweating, but according to Andrew, he suffered from a medical condition contracted during the Falklands War when, as a helicopter pilot, he suffered an overdose of adrenaline.

But dragging his daughter into the narrative as he explained why he could not have been in Tramp with the then 17-year-old Miss Roberts on March 10, 2001 — one of the dates on which she has claimed they had sex — was risky.

Viewers were left wondering why he had such a strong memory of taking Princess Beatrice to a friend’s birthday party at Pizza Express in Woking, Surrey, while admitting to no recollection of being photographed with his arm around the bare midriff of Virginia Roberts.

Somewhere, there will be a record of the excursion to the pizza joint. Like other senior royals, the Prince is accompanied at all times by armed police bodyguards. 

Details will have been entered into a pocketbook as ‘Purple Four One’ — Andrew’s Scotland Yard call sign — and travelling to Surrey with Woking in a bracket perhaps alongside. The times will also be noted.

Andrew could easily have said that his protection officers could verify his movements that day.

Those details might also reveal that there was plenty of time left that day after the birthday party for the Duke to go on to London to meet Roberts. Which brings us back to the infamous photograph.

Andrew claimed that it had been taken upstairs at the Belgravia mews home of his friend Ghislaine Maxwell, who is also in the picture. But, in the same breath, he told Newsnight he had never been upstairs at Ghislaine’s home. 

If that is the case, how does he know it was upstairs? And what about his claim that the informal outfit he was wearing in the picture — open-neck shirt and casual trousers — were his ‘travelling clothes’?

In London, he insisted, he wore a suit when he went out at night. But some eight months earlier, in July 2000, I wrote a piece about Andrew. He had been on a visit to China White, a then fashionable London nightclub, and he had been photographed leaving it wearing jeans and an open-neck shirt.

Many will see Andrew’s Saturday night self-immolation as an act of great folly, to rank alongside other TV royal extravaganzas, such as Diana’s Panorama confession and Charles’s admission of adultery to Jonathan Dimbleby.

Certainly, the Andrew interview was kept secret, much like Diana’s. We know he sought and obtained the permission of the Queen, but other members of the family, including Prince Charles, who has taken a dim view of his brother’s lack of judgment over Epstein, were merely informed as a courtesy.

Yesterday, amid the fallout, it emerged that aides to the Prince had been at loggerheads over the wisdom of doing the interview.

Formidable private secretary Amanda Thirsk, a former banker, was the driving force behind the project. She sat in on the interview, encouraged him to use his own words, and was convinced it would show the Prince as ‘authentic’.

But she had to overrule PR consultant Jason Stein, a former adviser to Amber Rudd until she left the Cabinet, who had been implacably opposed to the idea.

He had only recently been drafted in and proposed a more long-term strategy to rebuild the Prince’s reputation, including charity work and two set-piece newspaper interviews to mark his 60th birthday next February — one in Britain and one in America.

He urged the Prince to reject the Newsnight overtures because he feared it would backfire.

But Miss Thirsk, who has run the Prince’s private office for seven years, was convinced it was the right strategy. For more than a year, she had been leading the negotiations with Newsnight producer and ex-barrister Samantha McAlister — a former European debating champion whose persuasive skills proved invaluable.

With recriminations flying about the interview, it was not just Andrew’s judgment that was being questioned, but also those who thought it was a good idea.

All the same, Thirsk believed the programme offered the chance to get across two major points: one, to discredit the Roberts allegations, and two, to explain precisely the story behind the Central Park photograph.

‘The idea was that he would come across as authentic and people would see he had nothing to hide,’ a friend of the Duke told me.

It may, in theory, have seemed a good idea, but Andrew cannot think on his feet, nor is he a natural communicator. Brave as this may originally have seemed, it does now seem a strategy that has backfired spectacularly.

Simply picking up the pieces of his official life and carrying on with his royal duties now looks problematic. For Andrew, far from ending the controversy, he has merely fuelled it. 

‘Andrew said he would follow the advice of his lawyers on this decision. If he has nothing to hide and has committed no crime, then why doesn’t he just make the decision to share what he does know about Epstein and his close associates or employees with the FBI?

‘Anyone, no matter if he is a prince or a pauper, should provide information that he or she may have to law enforcement if that might assist in a criminal investigation.’

The Queen’s former press secretary Dickie Arbiter said: ‘You can’t have a relationship with someone like Jeffrey Epstein for over ten years and not come out without some stain on your character.’ One more sympathetic royal adviser said he thought Andrew had been ‘incredibly brave’ to put himself up for ‘fifty bloody minutes of relentless questioning’.

‘I don’t think he has been given enough credit for that but it was a big ask to put someone under the spotlight like that. It was badly executed,’ they added.

But sources close to the prince said he felt he had no choice but to address the issue that has dogged him for the last ten years.

One said: ‘He did an extraordinarily brave thing addressing head-on some very personal questions. The interview wasn’t scripted in the way that a politician’s interview can be. It was very raw. The duke felt he needed to personally address the two issues he is constantly being challenged about: did he have sex with Virginia Roberts and why did he visit that man Epstein in 2010?

‘He was incredibly clear on those two points. No he did not, and yes, visiting Epstein was a mistake.

‘The duke has put his side of the story across. He wasn’t lying. You can’t lie about something like that in those circumstances and if you were going to, you wouldn’t put yourself forward like that… It would be a stupid thing to do.

‘At some time you have got to give the guy a break and say he has done his level best to put himself out there, and if the interview had been conducted perfectly, then it would probably be fake.

‘Even at its worst, what he did in 2010 was an error of judgment. He lost his job [as a trade ambassador], he moved on and has done nine years solid work since.

‘He heard the message that he needed to speak and speak from the heart. It was a very tough thing for him to do, he is glad he did it.

‘It was a huge risk. But it had to be done. He just hopes this will now allow him to focus on his charities and initiatives.’ 

 

Prince Andrew on the ropes: A step-by-step guide to how Duke of York told HIS story in BBC interview that gripped millions of viewers 

It was seen as his chance to finally set the record straight on one of the darkest episodes in modern royal history.

But to the millions at home watching Prince Andrew squirm while being quizzed about every detail of his private life, it posed more questions than it answered.

The Duke of York rebutted allegations that he had three sexual encounters with a teenage girl introduced to him by paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Insisting he had ‘no recollection’ of ever meeting Virginia Roberts, the prince put forward a series of sometimes unusual explanations as to how the pair could not have been together in the circumstances she has suggested.

With a newly-uncovered email allegedly placing Andrew on Epstein’s private island, when Miss Roberts suggests the pair were involved in an ‘orgy’, here the Daily Mail analyses the claims…

THE LONDON MEETING

Virginia Roberts – now a 36-year-old mother known as Virginia Giuffre – claims she was forced by Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew three times.

The first occasion was allegedly in March 2001 when the 17-year-old was flown to London on Epstein’s private jet with alleged ‘madame’ Ghislaine Maxwell.

The prince claims he was introduced to Epstein through Maxwell in 1999, having met her while she studied at Oxford.

Miss Roberts claims that during their first meeting, the group had dinner and then went dancing at the Tramp nightclub in Mayfair.

In court depositions previously filed in the US, Miss Roberts said the group returned to Maxwell’s mews house in Belgravia, central London, where the pair took a bath together before having a sexual encounter.

Her claims were struck from the record by a US judge in 2015, who described them as ‘impertinent and immaterial’.

Andrew and Buckingham Palace have repeatedly denied the claims.

It was during this meeting – believe to be March 10, 2001 – that the prince is said to have posed for the now-infamous photo with his arm around Miss Roberts’s waist.

Responding to the allegations on BBC’s Newsnight, Prince Andrew said: ‘I have no recollection of ever meeting this lady, none whatsoever.’

On Miss Roberts’s claims that he bought her a drink, the prince said: ‘I don’t know where the bar is in Tramp’s. I don’t drink, I don’t think I’ve ever bought a drink in Tramp’s whenever I was there.’

The prince is a bona fide teetotaller and has been for a large part of his adult life. He said he didn’t know where the bar was. However, pictures taken on multiple occasions between 1983 and 1990 place him at Tramp nightclub. Flight records from Epstein’s private jet – dubbed ‘the Lolita Express’ – place Miss Roberts in London on the day in question following a whistle-stop tour from Palm Beach, Florida to Canada, Paris, Grenada in Spain and Tangier in Morocco, before touching down in Luton on March 9, 2001.

She left Luton Airport two days later to return to the US and allegedly developed the photograph of her and Andrew together on March 13.

NEW YORK INCIDENT

Miss Roberts claims she and the prince had sex on a second occasion at Epstein’s palatial Manhattan townhouse.

Andrew said the property had so many people coming and going that it was more like a ‘railway station’.

The duke is said to have used a present – a latex puppet of himself from the TV series Spitting Image – in a prank to grope the breasts of Miss Roberts and another woman, Johanna Sjoberg. Miss Sjoberg spoke out about the alleged incident four years before Miss Roberts first went public with her allegations in 2011. In an interview with The Mail on Sunday in 2007, she said: ‘We had a picture taken. Virginia, another girl there, sat on a chair and had the puppet on her lap. Andrew sat on another chair, I sat on his lap – and he put his hand on my breast.

‘Ghislaine put the puppet’s hand on Virginia’s breast, then Andrew put his hand on mine. It was a great joke. Everybody laughed.’

A Buckingham Palace spokesman said: ‘This relates to proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party. Any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.’

The duke said the alleged sexual encounter could not have happened because Miss Roberts had already departed New York for Epstein’s private island before the prince returned to the city.

‘I think that the date we have for that shows that I was in Boston or I was in New York the previous day and I was at a dinner for The Outward Bound Trust in New York and then I flew up to Boston the following day and then on the day that she says that this occurred, they’d already left to go the island before I got back from Boston,’ he said. The Court Circular shows that the prince departed London Heathrow on April 9 for New York. Flight logs of Epstein’s private jet suggest Miss Roberts arrived in New York from Florida the same day.

The following evening the prince did indeed fly to Boston for a meeting with the Outward Bound Trust – a UK-based educational charity of which he is patron – returning to New York on the afternoon of April 11.

Flight logs show that Miss Roberts, Epstein, Maxwell and a ‘Joann’ – thought to refer to Johanna Sjoberg – departed New York for St Thomas in the Caribbean at some time on April 11. Andrew suggests the timings mean the alleged sexual encounter ‘couldn’t have happened at all’. He added that a sexual encounter could not have taken place because he was staying with the Consul General – a premises on the same street as Epstein’s mansion.

CARIBBEAN ‘ORGY’

Andrew’s third alleged sexual liaison with Miss Roberts is said to have occurred around the time of her 18th birthday on Epstein’s private Caribbean island – Little Saint James.

Putting the claims to the prince, Emily Maitlis said: ‘In a legal deposition 2015, she said she had sex with you three times.

‘Once in a London house when she was trafficked to you in Maxwell’s house. Once in New York a month or so later at Epstein’s mansion and once on his private island in a group of seven or eight other girls.’

Andrew said the incidents had not taken place, but stopped short of accusing Miss Roberts of lying. ‘I’m not in a position to know what she’s trying to achieve but I can tell you categorically I don’t remember meeting her at all,’ he said.

‘I do not remember a photograph being taken and I’ve said consistently and frequently that we never had any sort of sexual contact whatever.’

In a 2015 legal deposition, Miss Roberts said that she and Andrew had sex during an ‘orgy’ on the private island with other girls – who she said looked under the age of 18 – who did not speak English. These allegations were struck from the record in the US. Flight logs show that Miss Roberts arrived in the US Virgin Islands on April 11 and then took a boat transfer to Epstein’s private island next door.

A group including Miss Roberts, Epstein, Maxwell and a finance manager-turned aspiring politician called Gwendolyn Beck then departed the island five days later for Epstein’s mansion in Florida.

The Court Circular does not indicate where the prince was during this period, however by April 15 – Easter Sunday – he was reportedly in the Bahamas. He had been absent from the Queen’s Easter service at Windsor Castle, and a courtier told The Daily Telegraph that he was on holiday at the exclusive destination – about a two-hour flight away from Epstein’s island.

New claims unearthed by the Mail appear to place Andrew on the island around the time Miss Roberts alleges their encounter took place.

Miss Beck, a Donald Trump fan who was given thousands of pounds by Epstein when she unsuccessfully ran for congress in 2014, said she had been on Little Saint James in the days preceding April 16, 2001.

In a previously unseen email to a freelance journalist, sent in 2015, she claimed the prince arrived ‘very late at night’, stayed for the following day and left early the following morning.

‘He was in the bungalow next to me,’ she claimed. ‘I heard no strange noises or anything unusual. If anything, he was flirting with me, but as I mentioned before I was in love with someone else.’

WHY DID THEIR FRIENDSHIP CONTINUE?

The prince and Epstein continued to socialise well into 2006. In May of that year, an arrest warrant was issued for the financier for sexual assault of a minor. Despite this, Epstein was invited to Windsor Castle for Princess Beatrice’s 18th birthday party.

Defending the invitation, the prince said: ‘I was asking Ghislaine. But even so, at the time I don’t think I… certainly I wasn’t aware when the invitation was issued what was going on in the United States.’

Epstein was arrested eight days after attending the celebrations.

Prince Andrew told the BBC that he ‘ceased contact’ with Epstein ‘after I was aware that he was under investigation and that was later in 2006’.

In September of that year, Andrew flew on Epstein’s private jet. Epstein was not on board the Luton to Edinburgh flight, said to be to a private wedding, however Maxwell was.

He said he did not speak to him again until 2010, when they were pictured walking together in New York’s Central Park, shortly after the paedophile’s release from prison.

The prince stayed at Epstein’s New York home for several days, despite telling Miss Maitlis he had visited him solely to break off their friendship.

It was ‘a convenient place to stay’, he said. ‘With a benefit of all the hindsight that one can have, it was definitely the wrong thing to do.’

It was put to the royal that Epstein had held a party to celebrate his release from prison during that trip, with the duke invited as the ‘guest of honour.’ Andrew confirmed he attended a ‘small dinner party’.

His reason for visiting the convicted paedophile to end their friendship?

‘My judgment was probably coloured by my tendency to be too honourable, but that’s just the way it is,’ he said.

Responding to allegations about the prince’s timeline, a Buckingham Palace spokesman said: ‘His Royal Highness was very clear, as he has been consistently, that he did not have any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts.’